Evaluation of Eight Project Selection Methods: the Case of Information Systems

Authors

  • Eelko K.R.E Huizingh University of Groningen
  • Hans C.J. Vrolijk University of Groningen

Abstract

Determining the priorities of projects is an essential step in the planning process. Usually, the limited availability of resources prohibits the simultaneous execution of all proposed projects, A number of project selection methods have been developed to ensure a deliberate process of determining priorities. In this paper we describe and discuss eight of these methods: cost benefit analysis, risk analysis, ranking, scoring, zero one programming, knowledge-based systems, steering committees, and the analytic hierarchy process. We evaluate these methods based on a set of eight criteria. We conclude that none of the methods meets all requirements. An important shortcoming of most methods is the inability to support group decision-making despite the increasing importance of this criterion. As a consequence, the appropriateness of the methods depends on the characteristics of the decision situation. Our analysis provides guidelines for choosing a method in a specific situation.

Keywords:

Evaluation of projects, Group decision-making criteria, Guidelines for choosing a method